COURT OF THE KING’S BENCH
BERGEN
TROY THOMPSON,
Petitioner
PETITION FOR INTERPRETATION
1. The petitioner, Troy Thompson, requests an interpretation regarding the constitutionality of the Constitution Act 2006. Questions: Does the Constitution Act repeal the Charter of Hanover? If not, is it superior to the Charter? If not, is the Constitution Act unconstitutional?
2. On 2 May 2005 the Charter of Hanover was proclaimed, declaring that "the sovereignty of the state is vested in the King absolutely, and thus nothing whatsoever may finally bind his will." On 11 November 2006, the Constitution Act was enacted. The Constitution Act firmly binds the King's will, in that it forces His Majesty to accept the nomination of Parliament for Prime Minister and the nominations of the Prime Minister for the Ministers. While the Constitution Act directly repealed the Royal Proclamation which constituted Parliament, it contains no other passage directly or indirectly repealing or altering any other document, including the Charter of Hanover.
Signed,
Troy Thompson
Petitioner
Mr. Thompson,
It is the judgment of the Crown that the Charter and the Constitution Act are in harmony because the Constitution Act was granted Royal Ascent under the very Parliament We called forth. We have the right to delegate Our various powers and this is exactly what We have done.
Furthermore and specifically to the issue of repeal, the Charter of Hanover does remain in effect, at least nominally. The simple reality is that the Crown wishes to operate hand in hand with a Parliament. However, you have touched on what might be called the third rail in Hanoverian Politics, that is, the formation of a complete Constitution.
We have asked the nation if such was desired, and the response has been a resounding "no", as evidenced by the lack of enthusiasm for such an undertaking. We have stated and maintain the position that the nation needs a constitution, but that We shall not allow Hanover to rush into one, nor allow any constitution properly ratified to simply be discarded and set aside as has been the fate of Our other documents of organic law. Once Hanover has a constitution We shall operate under the strictures therein.
Does this answer the petition?
Alexander R.