The Forums of Glennain

Full Version: Concerning the Recent Letters Patent
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

Christopher Livingston

Dread Sovereign Lord:

I am concerned to see that the Chancery has not complied with the terms of the Constitution Act when composing the Letters Patent for the Home and Foreign Secretaries. As Your Majesty will doubtless recall, the Act states that "ministers may only exercise those powers specifically stated in the documents appointing them" (Subsection 1E); since the recent Letters Patent do not specifically state any powers, under the law the new ministers are wholly powerless.

Also, neither of the documents bear the Prime Minister's countersignature, as is required by Subsection 1C of the aforementioned Act. Thus, under the law, the Letters do not hold legal force, and the ministers do not hold their offices at all. Of course, we all know that the Prime Minister consents to these appointments, but Hanover is a nation ruled by laws, and we must obey those laws if they are to have any meaning.

I hope that Your Majesty will ensure that the Letters Patent are revised in Chancery, so that the new officers may enter into their offices confident that they have real legal authority. I feel rather pedantic making this statement, but Hanover has always taken herself seriously, and conforming rigidly to the law is an important part of being a serious nation.

Your humble servant,

+Christopher Bergensis
Dread Sovereign Lord,

A reply to the Archbishop's concerns:


Lord Chancellor's Office

Regarding the recent Letters Patent, I have more than adequately fulfilled the requirements of the constitution. The documents have been sufficiently rectified, my Lord. The matter is now closed.

Justin Leopold Albert Christian George
Lord Chancellor

Christopher Livingston

Dread Sovereign Lord,

I am obliged to point out that the Letters Patent still do not bear the Prime Minister's countersignature.
Reference URL's