Commonwealth Forums

Full Version: Unitary State vs. Federation
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Honourable Delegates,

One of the many large-scale decisions we must make is whether the unified Kingdoms will be a unitary state or a federation. It is first necessary to clarify exactly what I mean by these terms. Wikipedia gives the following definitions:

Quote:
A unitary state is a state or country that is governed constitutionally as one single unit, with one constitutionally created parliament. The term is the antonym of Federation. Governmental power may well be transferred to lower levels, to regionally or locally elected assemblies, governors and mayors ("devolved government"), but in a unitary state the central government has the principal right to recall such delegated power.

A federation is a state comprised of a number of self-governing regions (often themselves referred to as states) united by a central (federal) government. In a federation the self-governing status of the component states is constitutionally entrenched and may not be altered by a unilateral decision of the central government. Federations may be multi-ethnic, or cover a large area of territory, although neither is necessarily the case. Federations are often founded on an original agreement between a number of sovereign states. The component states of a federation usually do not have the right to secede unilaterally.

Among the most prominent examples of unitary states and federations are the United Kingdom and the United States, respectively. Given how much trouble our Commonwealth's lack of unity has been in recent history, I favour the unitary structure. What is the opinion of the Congress?

Sincerely,

Lord Oldenburg

My Lord Oldenburg,

I fear that a unitary state would rob our commonwealth of the individual cultures, however small, of Calormen and Athenoi. Yet as a realist I accept that neither of the two entities could exist in equilibrium with the larger entity of Hanover in a federation.

I therefore support your proposal for a unitary state but with members elected to represent the provinces of Hanover itself, Calormen and Athenoi. That way, the individual identity and culture of the two minor provinces could be maintained within the unitary structure of a Greater Hanover.
I support the federation idea. We just need to define the roles of the kingdoms within the EMpire.
Fursten von Silesia,

We must interject for a moment. We have a federation now. The commonwealth, and it has proved unworkable. All the delegates have agreed on this.

Do you propose we continue to use the same structure which has lead us here? If not, please outline the differences which would make the new structure workable.

Regards,
HM Alexander of Hanover
the commonwealth is unworkable is because it has fallen to the wayside and never was used.

for a federation to work is to decide what the responsibilities of the Federation are and what the responsibilities of the dominions are.

I know on Calormen's part, I thought it was independent and acted as such until i found the treaty subjecting it to hanover.
Fursten von Silesia,

While We believe We understand what you mean, perhaps the outline of a draft would give more complete understanding. An example would help.

Which responsibilities do you mean, and how shall they be divided?

Regards,
HM Alexander of Hanover
USIng the US COnstitution as a guide

I use Article IV all sections, Article I section 6, 9, 10 as the basis for the responsibilities of the federation level organization and dominion level governments

US COnstitution
http://www.constitutionfacts.com/cons.shtml

US amendments
http://www.constitutionfacts.com/amendments.shtml
I do not believe we should be using the US constitution, it is a republican document with republican leanings and I am a monarchist, we are a monarchy
Perhaps we should have a system similar to the Holy Roman Empire.
The HRE's government was notoriously subject to internal conflict - many of it's worst conflicts were civil wars. A system modeled upon it seems an unlikely remedy to our recent problems...
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's